Darwin Blanch vs Ivan Marrero Curbelo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 11 Jun at 03:45 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Blanch vs I. Marrero Curbelo

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ESP
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Blanch 1 - 0 Curbelo
They have played 2 sets in total, with Darwin Blanch winning 2 and Ivan Marrero Curbelo winning 0. The last match between Darwin Blanch and Ivan Marrero Curbelo was at the M25 Martos, 11-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Darwin Blanch getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Blanch | 1 |
| Curbelo | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Martos(06-11-25)
D. Blanch vs I. M. Curbelo H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $20,800 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 58.96% (79-55) | Career Total W/L | 55.24% (216-175) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 33.33% (1-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
D. Blanch vs I. M. Curbelo Match Preview:
- Who performs better on second serves recently? Blanch leads narrowly, securing 45.04% of points compared to Curbelo's 42.6%.
- Curbelo has the upper hand in returning games, winning 49.44% of opponents' second serves, surpassing Blanch's 46.05%.
- Regarding first serve returns, Curbelo also excels with 35.56%, while Blanch only manages 29.16%.
- Handling breakpoints, Blanch has saved 57.39%, slightly better than Curbelo's 52.34%.
- Over the past year, Blanch boasts a higher overall match win rate at 62.79%, compared to Curbelo's 54.55%.
- Both players fare best on Hard courts; Blanch wins 62% of matches, slightly ahead of Curbelo's 57% on this surface.
- Blanch has excelled in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events in the past year, winning 71.43% of matches, whereas Curbelo has a 56.1% success rate in the same category.
- Curbelo's opponents have a higher average ranking at 364.4 compared to Blanch’s opponents' average rank of 414.49.
- In deciding set scenarios, Blanch's performance is impressive, winning 67% of such matches, while Curbelo only wins 20%.
- Regarding breakpoint conversion, Curbelo surpasses Blanch with a rate of 46.92% against Blanch's 38.6%.
Editorial Prediction (June 11, 2025, UTC):
As we approach the eagerly awaited matchup, the statistics present intriguing insights into both players' capabilities. Blanch displays a slight edge in second serve performance and has a knack for saving breakpoints in critical situations, reflecting a composed mindset under pressure.
Curbelo, however, shines in return games, especially against opponents' first serves, indicating a strong ability to pressure the server. This advantage might give Curbelo a strategic edge during tight service games.
While both players perform best on Hard surfaces, Blanch's superior record in deciding sets and overall match win rate suggests a more consistent and resilient competitor.
Considering these observations, Blanch is slightly favored to claim victory in this match, given their balanced skill set and ability to handle high-pressure situations effectively.
Darwin Blanch vs Ivan Marrero Curbelo Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Blanch vs I. M. Curbelo H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 8 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:24:21 | Average Match Time | 1:24:21 |
| 72% (39/54) | 1st Serve % | 74% (48/65) |
| 72% (28/39) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (27/48) |
| 53% (8/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 65% (11/17) |
| 22% (2/9) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
| 42% (27/65) | Return Points Win % | 33% (18/54) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
D. Blanch Recent Matches Played
I. M. Curbelo Recent Matches Played

D. Blanch vs I. M. Curbelo Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.96% (79/55) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.24% (216/175) |
| 57.61% (178/131) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.87% (495/391) |
| 52.47% (1510/1368) | Games Win/Loss | 53.01% (4258/3774) |
| 64.29% (54/30) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.85% (133/93) |
| 48.78% (20/21) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.32% (79/78) |
| 55.56% (5/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (4/4) |
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 453 | Aces Total | 138 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 288 | Total Double Faults | 696 |
| 1:23:20 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 342.69 | Average Opponent Rank | 315.09 |
| 62% (4818/7787) | 1st Serve % | 66% (9278/14036) |
| 69% (3306/4818) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (5662/9278) |
| 50% (1492/2969) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2279/4758) |
| 42% (319/757) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (726/1586) |
| 39% (3105/7910) | Return Points Win % | 43% (6006/13911) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 75.00% (3/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 37.04% (10/17) | Challenger W/L | 25.93% (7/20) |
| 67.01% (65/32) | Futures W/L | 57.42% (209/155) |
| 59% (77/131) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (212/383) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 66% (21/32) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (35/79) |
| 48% (20/42) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (42/106) |
| 84% (80/67) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (234/196) |
| 16% (80/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (234/38) |
| 22% (54/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (157/20) |